Equality

the thing with numbers is not only can they be presented in a number of different lights, they can be interpreted in a number of different ways, depending on the amount of bias.

thats why i just like to look at the plain fact. when a blown car hits their absolute best and the a/fuel car hits its absolute best, the a/fueler wins every time.

alot of scuttlebut was made about thacker's .38 compared to bradshaw's .36. hat's off to marty, but that was the absolute best run in those conditions. i think the nose was so light, the pedal was necessary to make it a .38 and not an abort. so all the talk about 'what if' i don't really think holds water. regardless if it did run, say a .35 w/o the pedal, we've seen bradshaw, reichert and others run in the .20's in very similar conditions. so the comparison of thacker's .38 to bradshaw's .36 isn't apples to apples.

also as duane shields pointed out at the tara meeting, as much as i want to see something done, i don't want the a/fuelers to be rendered non competitive. i just want the blown cars to be competitive again.